bruhno momento

— Posted inPets, Science — 3 min read

bruh moment en, dan moeten we het bijna onmogelijk maken om te vragen. Voorzitter, laat ons dan als voorbeeld de heer Gerrit Zalm vermelden. Hij is door de vorige voorzitter van de Europese Raad in de beweging geroepen. Nu is hij in zijn tweede termijn als voorzitter van de Europese Raad, en ik heb de eer hem te mogen ontmoeten. De heer Zalm had een goede, maar niet veelbelovende toespraak. De heer Zalm had er namelijk geen moeite mee zijn toespraak af te krijgen. De heer Zalm was de oorzaak van zijn eigen vergissing. De heer Zalm was zo onverwachts in zijn spreekbeurt dat de heer Zalm toen geen woord van de heer Prodi kreeg en toen hij toen de heer Prodi had gehoord het niet had, de heer Zalm kwam tot het besluit om de heer Prodi te verzoeken het woord te nemen. Als dat wel gebeurd was, dan zou het voorzitterschap van de Raad dan een ongelooflijke opdracht hebben moeten nemen en zijn verantwoordelijkheid te nemen.

De heer Zalm heeft geen verantwoordelijkheid, maar het voorzitterschap van de Raad. De heer Zalm heeft toen geen verantwoordelijkheid genomen en dat is toch een kwestie van verantwoordelijkheid. Dat moeten wij eens overdenken. Ik wil ook aan de heer Prodi vragen of hij de bezorgdheid van de burgers niet ziet en vooral die van de bevolking van de lidstaten. Wanneer wij op het laatste moment in de kwetsbaarste gebieden van Europa onder het oog van de media de vraag stellen of de verantwoordelijkheid van de Raad in deze zaak het voorzitterschap van de Raad is of dat van het voorzitterschap van de Raad, dan wordt het moeilijk de vraag te beantwoorden.

Wij krijgen de vraag: hoeveel tijd verstrijkt tussen de bijeenkomst van de Raad en de publicatie van de dagvaarding? Wij krijgen de vraag: waarom krijgt de Raad zijn bezorgdheid niet onder ogen en hoeveel tijd verstrijkt tussen de bijeenkomst van de Raad en de publicatie van de dagvaarding? De Raad heeft een enorme verantwoordelijkheid, maar daarom is het toch ook noodzakelijk dat de Raad het voorzitterschap van de Raad erkent. Dat is een ernstige zaak.

Als het voorzitterschap van de Raad niet erkent dat het een groot vergissing is geweest, dan krijgt de Raad geen uitdrukking van vertrouwen en dan kan hij er niet op vertrouwen dat de Europese bevolking in Europa vertrouwen heeft.

EDIT:
Ik heb de heer Prodi niet helemaal eerder gehoord.
Ik heb de heer Prodi toen nog niet gehoord.
Ik heb het ook niet eerder gehoord.
Ik heb het gewoon niet gehoord.

Join the Conversation

  1. Beantwoorden
  2. Beantwoorden
  3. Beantwoorden
  4. Beantwoorden
  5. Beantwoorden
  6. Beantwoorden
  7. Beantwoorden
  8. Beantwoorden

  9. This is very interesting, You’re an excessively skilled blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and stay up for seeking extra of your magnificent post.

    Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks

    Beantwoorden

  10. It is perfect time to make a few plans for the longer term and it is time to be happy.
    I have read this submit and if I could I wish to counsel you few attention-grabbing things or suggestions.
    Maybe you could write subsequent articles regarding this article.
    I wish to read more things about it!

    Beantwoorden

  11. I am no longer certain the place you’re getting your information, however good
    topic. I needs to spend a while studying much more or understanding more.
    Thank you for magnificent information I was looking for
    this info for my mission.

    Beantwoorden
  12. Beantwoorden

  13. how can i get tegretol without insurance where can i buy cheap tegretol without insurance where to buy generic tegretol pill
    can you get cheap tegretol without prescription where to buy generic tegretol without a prescription where can i buy cheap tegretol without rx
    where can i get generic tegretol without prescription
    can i buy cheap tegretol pill order tegretol without dr prescription where to buy tegretol pills
    can i get tegretol without prescription how to get generic tegretol pills cost of cheap tegretol tablets

    Beantwoorden
  14. Beantwoorden

  15. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this fantastic blog!
    I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.

    I look forward to new updates and will share this
    website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

    Beantwoorden
  16. Beantwoorden
  17. Beantwoorden
  18. Beantwoorden
  19. Beantwoorden
  20. Beantwoorden

  21. A Pakistani man who was convicted of sexually assaulting a
    woman in 2017 was allowed to stay in Britain after claiming
    he was gay.

    The sex offender had been living in the UK illegally for
    11 years but was granted refugee status after arguing
    he was homosexual and would face persecution in his home country.

    The unnamed 53-year-old made his bid for asylum and insisted he was gay
    only a month after he was arrested for groping a woman – a crime he was convicted of
    later the same year.

    However, he was allowed to stay in the UK by an asylum court despite there
    being a lack of evidence that he was homosexual, official
    judgements show.

    The Home Office ‘did not accept he was living in the
    UK as a gay man’ because of his flimsy evidence, it was heard.

    But due to a legal blunder, his testimony went unchallenged and the
    man was granted permission to stay in April 2024.

    However, the case will now be heard afresh after the Home Office successfully
    appealed the decision.

    The Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the Upper Tribunal heard
    the Pakistani – only named as ‘MR’ – came to the UK
    in 2006.

    A Pakistani man who was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman in 2017
    while in Britain was allowed to stay in the country
    after claiming he was gay and could not return to his home nation due to fear of
    persecution (stock photo)

    He was granted entry as a student and had leave to remain status until
    December 2006 but overstayed his visa, the tribunal heard. 

    He applied for leave to remain on human rights grounds in 2012 but the Home
    Office rejected it that year.

    In May 2017, he was arrested by police and in the same year he was convicted
    for sexually assaulting a woman by touching.

    In June of 2017, he claimed asylum – asserting a ‘fear of persecution’ in his home country if
    he were to be deported.

    It was heard that MR had pleaded guilty to sex assault at a court but when his asylum bid
    was underway he denied the offence and said he is gay.

    In January 2023 then home secretary Suella Braverman refused him leave to remain.

    ‘The Secretary of State [Braverman] did not accept that the appellant was
    living in the United Kingdom as a gay man’, an asylum court judgement said.

    Braverman said there was ‘no evidence of a substantial relationship being in place’ despite MR claiming he was in a gay relationship.

    In January 2023 then home secretary Suella Braverman refused him leave to remain as she said there ‘was ‘no evidence of a
    substantial relationship being in place’

    MR said he has been with a man only named as ‘Mr K’ since 2019 and appealed.

    It was heard letters from Mr K and another of MR’s witnesses do not mention his
    stated sexuality and added ‘little weight’ to his claim.

    He said he was ‘reliant’ on Mr K but there was no evidence they lived
    together, no shared bills, and no other documentary
    evidence which supported their relationship.

    He was also ‘inconsistent’ as to when he realised
    he was gay.

    An appeal hearing was heard in April last year, however
    first-tier tribunal judge Anthony Cartin was ‘surprised’ when the Home Office’s
    representative did not challenge MR’s testimony.

    Judge Cartin wrote in his judgement: ‘At the end of cross-examination, I raised with the presenting officer [the Home Office representative] that she had omitted
    to challenge the assertions of the appellant that he was gay
    and that he was in a relationship with a man in the UK.

    ‘She indicated that she had asked all the questions she wished to about the claim.
    I pointed out that it was my understanding that [the Secretary of State]
    did not accept the truth of the claim he made.

    ‘This was the basis for their rejection of it as I understood matters.

    The man – only named as ‘MR’ – came to the UK in 2006,
    but overstayed his visa. He applied for leave
    to remain on human rights grounds in 2012 but the Home Office rejected
    it that year

    ‘If this was [the Secretary of State’s] position, then I took the view that fairness dictated that their case should be put to the appellant.
    He must be given an opportunity to respond to that position.

    ‘I made clear that it there was no challenge on these matters, I
    would make a note to this effect and was likely to allow the appeal.

    ‘I was asked to rise so that the presenting officer could take further
    instructions.

    ‘This was somewhat surprising as the questions of challenge did not strike me
    as needing to be numerous or complex, but it was necessary that the Home Office position should be put to the witness, and
    he should be challenged on assertions made which were not accepted.

    ‘I rose for around 10 minutes. Upon resuming, [the Home Office representative] remained steadfast in her position.

    ‘Nowhere in the cross-examination was there any suggestion that this claim was a fabrication.

    ‘In fact, the questions asked gave tacit acceptance of the claim to be in a relationship with and
    living with another man. As I made clear during the hearing, in these circumstances, there is consequently unchallenged evidence that the appellant is gay
    and in a relationship with a man.’

    Judge Cartin ruled that due to the lack of challenge, he did not need to hear
    from the Mr K and MR’s other witness, found that MR was gay, and allowed his appeal to
    stay in the UK.

    The Home Office ‘did not accept he was living in the UK
    as a gay man’ because of his flimsy evidence, it was
    heard. But due to a legal blunder, his testimony
    went unchallenged and the man was allowed to stay in April 2024

    Judge Cartin said had his sexuality been challenged he could have considered the
    fact that he was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman.

    Since, the Home Office has appealed Judge Cartin’s decision and the Upper Tribunal has found
    that he erred in law.

    Upper Tribunal Judge Declan O’Callaghan said the Home Office were deprived of the chance of questioning MR’s two witnesses,
    who they believed would not provide convincing arguments that MR was gay.

    As a result, MR’s sexuality was not properly considered ‘in the round’.

    Judge O’Callaghan said: ‘I consider, on the facts arising,
    that it was wrong in principle for the Judge to conclude that he was required to find the appellant
    credible as to core elements of his case and so deny the Secretary of State the opportunity to cross-examine the appellant’s two supporting witnesses as to credit.

    ‘I conclude that the failings identified are such that it
    was not reasonably and lawfully open to the Judge to adopt this course on the particular facts arising.

    ‘Consequent to the unlawful direction, the Judge did not lawfully consider the evidence before him in the round.

    ‘His reasoning is fatally infected by the procedurally unfair approach adopted.

    ‘The Judge’s reasoning is adversely impacted by procedural unfairness, and the only proper course is
    to set aside the decision in its entirety..’

    A new hearing will take place at a later date.

    The Home Office

    Beantwoorden
  22. Beantwoorden

  23. The Sаlt Trick isn’t just another trend—it’s gaining attention for its science-backed benefits!
    By enhancing bloоd circulation and boоsting nitric ߋxide levels,
    this easy technique has been linked to improved vitalіty, performance, and confidence.
    Perfect for use in the shower or ɑs part of
    your nighttime routine, the гesults are making waｖes.

    Іs the Salt Trick Real or Just Hype?

    Whilｅ skeptics quеstion its validitү, rеcent studies and a growing number of testimonials are
    brіnging this anciｅnt practice into the spotlight. Seе how modern science iѕ ᥙncovering its hidden potential.

    my blog post … website

    Beantwoorden

  24. Hi, i feel that i noticed you visited my weblog thus i got
    here to return the prefer?.I’m attempting to in finding
    things to enhance my web site!I guess its good enough to make use of
    some of your ideas!!

    Beantwoorden
  25. Beantwoorden

  26. Ice Ꮃater Hack – A Simple Weight Loss Trick
    Wһɑt is the Ice Water Hack?
    The Ice Water Ηack iѕ a natural method that involves drinking ice-ϲold water to ѕtimulate thermogenesis,
    a process that helps burn more calories. Some variations, like
    the 7-Sеcond Ice Ԝater Hɑck with Baking Soda,
    claim to aiԀ ɗigestion and promote alkalinity.

    Does the Ice Water Hack Work?
    After trying the Ice Water Hack for a month, I noticed increaѕed
    hydration and a reduction in bloating. Wһile it’s not
    a miracle solution, it complements a heaⅼthy diet and еⲭercise well.

    Pros & Cons of the Ice Ꮃater Haϲk
    ✅ Easy to implement – requires no speϲial ingredients
    ✅ Affοrⅾɑble – just use ice and water
    ✅ Helps with hydration, which can reduce hunger

    ❌ Not a standalone weight loss solution
    ❌ Works best when combineɗ with healthy habits

    Final Thoᥙghts
    The Ice Water Hаck is an easy and inexpensive way to support
    weight losѕ efforts. Whether you try the 7-Second Ice Water Hack or simply drink more cold water, tһis metһoɗ may help boost yoᥙr
    metabolism and keep yοu refreshed.

    my weƄpage web page

    Beantwoorden
  27. Beantwoorden

  28. Hey! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog.
    Is it hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out
    pretty fast. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not
    sure where to begin. Do you have any points
    or suggestions? Thanks

    Beantwoorden
  29. Beantwoorden

  30. Great items from you, man. I have take into
    accout your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful.

    I actually like what you have received here, certainly like what you
    are saying and the way in which wherein you assert it. You’re making it
    entertaining and you continue to care for to stay
    it smart. I can’t wait to learn far more from you.
    That is really a terrific web site.

    Beantwoorden

  31. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three emails
    with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove
    people from that service? Cheers!

    Beantwoorden
  32. Beantwoorden
  33. Beantwoorden
  34. Beantwoorden
  35. Beantwoorden

  36. Hey there! I simply would like to give you a big thumbs up for your excellent info
    you have got right here on this post. I’ll be returning to your web site for more
    soon.

    Beantwoorden

  37. how to get cheap clarinex pills where can i buy generic clarinex pills how to buy generic clarinex without dr prescription
    order generic clarinex price can i buy clarinex pill where buy cheap clarinex tablets
    can i order clarinex without a prescription
    where can i buy cheap clarinex pill buying generic clarinex without rx can i order clarinex without a prescription
    order clarinex for sale where to get cheap clarinex without dr prescription where to buy cheap clarinex online

    Beantwoorden
  38. Beantwoorden

  39. Hi, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has
    some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick
    heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!

    Beantwoorden
  40. Beantwoorden
  41. Beantwoorden
  42. Beantwoorden
  43. Beantwoorden
  44. Beantwoorden
  45. Beantwoorden

  46. I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
    I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly.
    I’m quite sure I will learn many new stuff right here!
    Good luck for the next!

    Beantwoorden
  47. Beantwoorden
  48. Beantwoorden

  49. Hi, I do think this is a great site. I stumbledupon it 😉 I am
    going to revisit yet again since I book marked
    it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may
    you be rich and continue to guide other people.

    Beantwoorden
  50. Beantwoorden
Comment

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *